Article
“I Didn’t Come Here to Make Trouble”: Resistance Strategies
Utilized by Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth in the
Midwestern U.S.
Megan S. Paceley
1,
*, Jacob Goffnett
2
, April L. Diaz
1
, Shanna K. Kattari
3,4
, Jennifer Navarro
1
and Emera Greenwood
1
Citation: Paceley, M.S.; Goffnett, J.;
Diaz, A.L.; Kattari, S.K.; Navarro, J.;
Greenwood, E. “I Didn’t Come Here
to Make Trouble”: Resistance
Strategies Utilized by Transgender
and Gender Diverse Youth in the
Midwestern U.S.. Youth 2021, 1, 29–46.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
youth1010005
Academic Editor: Giulio D’Urso
Received: 28 November 2021
Accepted: 17 December 2021
Published: 20 December 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, 1545 Lilac Lane, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;
adiaz25@ku.edu (A.L.D.); janavarro23@ku.edu (J.N.); emera@ku.edu (E.G.)
2
School of Social Work, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; jmgoffne@uark.edu
3
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
skattari@umich.edu
4
Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, 1080 S University Ave,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
* Correspondence: mpaceley@ku.edu; Tel.: +1-785-864-2284
Abstract: Research on transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth demonstrates the negative
outcomes associated with trauma and oppression based on gender identity and expression. Related
research illustrates how TGD youth are resilient in the face of oppression through individual (e.g.,
navigating difficult relationships, seeking mental health support) and community (e.g., access to
community resources) factors. However, this research is limited by an understanding of resilience
as overcoming challenges rather than exploring the possibly unique ways that TGD youth resist
oppression as a form of resilience. This qualitative study utilized in-depth interviews with 19 TGD
youth living in two Midwestern states, a region of the U.S. characterized by high levels of hostility
and victimization toward TGD young people. Thematic analyses revealed the ways in which TGD
youth engage in resistance strategies in the face of oppression. At an intrapersonal level, strategies
included resisting oppressive narratives, affirming one’s own gender, maintaining authenticity, and
finding hope. At an interpersonal level, strategies were standing up for self and others, educating
others, and avoiding hostility. Finally, at a community-level, TGD youth were engaging in activism
and organizing and enhancing visibility and representation. Findings are discussed and implications
are identified.
Keywords: transgender; gender diverse; adolescents; resilience; critical consciousness; resistance
1. Introduction
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth have genders that differ from their sex
assigned at birth (e.g., male or female), including binary, nonbinary, agender, and gender
fluid identities. Much of the scholarship on TGD youth has examined the prevalence and
causes of health disparities and other poor outcomes, illustrating the very real consequences
of stigma, discrimination, and victimization of TGD youth [1,2]. Although critical in
establishing an understanding of the relationship between oppression and mental health, a
deficit-oriented approach fails to account for the strengths of TGD youth and the ways in
which they cultivate resilience [3] or resist oppression [4].
Resilience is “the quality of being able to survive and thrive in the face of adver-
sity” [5] (p. 210) and may include both individual and contextual factors [6]. It has been
conceptualized as both a positive outcome and a process for dealing with challenges [7].
While the concept of resilience is useful and important in shifting away from a predominant
focus on risk, it has also been critiqued for “inadvertently put(ting) the burden on youth
to build resilience and navigate discrimination, instead of focusing on how to change,
Youth 2021, 1, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth1010005 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/youth