Thermal effects of Zechstein salt
and the Early to Middle Jurassic
hydrothermal event in the
central Polish Basin
Gary W. Zielinski, Pawel Poprawa, Jan Szewczyk,
Izabella Grotek, Hubert Kiersnowski,
and Robyn L. B. Zielinski
ABSTRACT
Deep gas potential in the Polish Basin may factor significantly
in European geopolitics, and thermal effects can influence
that outcome there and elsewhere. Deep (>3 km [9843 ft])
well data from the Kujawy area of the central Polish Basin
reveal average geothermal gradient (36°C/km), thermal con-
ductivity of Mesozoic strata (k = 2.29 W/m K), and present-
day heat flow (Q = 82.4 mW/m
2
) that is 3% less than that
obtained using the entire borehole. The extrapolated surface
temperature (–6.2°C) is in good agreement with temperatures
during the Weichselian glaciation. The thermal conductivity
of the Upper Permian Zechstein (4.89 W/m K) is in good agree-
ment with values from the North Sea and northern Germany.
Steady-state heat-flow theory (one-dimensional [1-D]) predicts
present-day temperature (199°C) at the base of Zechstein cap
rock at 6-km (19,685-ft) depth in Kujawy. This is reduced just
more than 10°C by low Zechstein thermal gradients (16.8°C/
km). Because of thermal refraction, two-dimensional and three-
dimensional models of Zechstein salt pillows can significantly
negate this cooling effect; however, such effects appear absent
in the Kujawy wells studied.
A widespread Early to Middle Jurassic (∼195–175 Ma)
hydrothermal event appears to have reached maximum in the
Kujawy area. A 455°C paleotemperature at 7-km (22,966-ft)
depth (Carboniferous) is predicted by 1-D conductive heat
transfer; however, geologic evidence does not support this re-
sult. The discrepancy is reconciled by convective heat transfer
AUTHORS
Gary W. Zielinski Omegalink International
Ltd., P.O. Box 2152, Campton, New Hampshire;
omegalink@juno.com
Gary Zielinski holds a Ph.D. from Columbia
University under M. G. Langseth (Heat Flow
Department), Lamont-Doherty Earth Observa-
tory. He spent six years at Gulf Research and
Development (Harmarville Laboratory), where
he studied measurement and modeling of
hydrocarbon thermal regimes. He continued
this work at Brookhaven National Laboratory,
as a visiting research associate at Lamont-
Doherty, and since 1989, as a director at
Omegalink International Ltd.
Pawel Poprawa Polish Geological Institute,
Polish Geological Survey, 4 Rakowiecka Street,
Warsaw, Poland; pawel.poprawa@pgi.gov.pl
Pawel Poprawa studied geosciences and petro-
leum geology at Jagiellonian University, Krakow;
AGH Technical University, Krakow; and Uni-
versity College Dublin, completing his M.S. thesis
on the organic geochemistry of hydrocarbon
source rocks. He now heads the Petroleum
Prospection Division of the Polish Geological
Institute, assessing the shale gas potential of
Poland and its neighbors via basin analysis
and thermal, tectonic, and burial history
reconstructions.
Jan Szewczyk Polish Geological Institute,
4 Rakowiecka Street, Warsaw, Poland;
jan.szewczyk@pgi.gov.pl
Jan Szewczyk is a graduate in physics of the
lithosphere from Warsaw University and holds
a Ph.D. in nuclear geophysics from the Polish
Geological Institute. His work includes the deter-
mination of petrophysical parameters from
log analysis, geothermics of Poland, hydrogeo-
logic and geothermal conditions in deep bore-
holes, and paleoclimatic change based on the
subsurface temperature data. He authored a new
method of borehole heat-flow determination and
coauthored a new heat-flow map of Poland (2009).
Izabella Grotek Polish Geological Institute,
Polish Geological Survey, 4 Rakowiecka Street,
Warsaw, Poland; hubert.kiersnowski@pgi.gov.pl
Izabella Grotek is a graduate in geology (petrol-
ogy) from Warsaw University, with a Ph.D. from
Copyright ©2012. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved.
Manuscript received September 20, 2011; provisional acceptance November 28, 2011; revised
manuscript received January 9, 2012; revised manuscript provisional acceptance February 16, 2012; 2nd
revised manuscript received March 12, 2012; final acceptance April 2, 2012.
DOI:10.1306/04021211142
AAPG Bulletin, v. 96, no. 10 (October 2012), pp. 1981 – 1996 1981