CSIRO PUBLISHING
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/fpb Functional Plant Biology, 2004, 31, 847–855
De novo protein synthesis in relation to ammonia and proline
accumulation in water stressed white clover
Tae-Hwan Kim
A,E
, Bok-Rye Lee
A
, Woo-Jin Jung
B
, Kil-Yong Kim
C
, Jean-Christophe Avice
D
and Alain Ourry
D
A
Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and
Life Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
B
Glucosamine Saccharide Materials Laboratory (NRL), Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam
National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
C
Department of Biological and Environmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Science, APSRC, Chonnam
National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea.
D
UMR, INRA-UCBN,
´
Ecophysiologie v´ eg´ etale, Agronomie et Nutritions NCS, Institut de Biologie Fondamentale
et Appliqu´ ee, Universit´ e de Caen, F-14 032 Caen Cedex, France.
E
Corresponding author; email: grassl@chonnam.ac.kr
Abstract. The kinetics of protein incorporation from newly-absorbed nitrogen (N, de novo protein synthesis) was
estimated by
15
N tracing in 18-week-old white clover plants (Trifolium repens L. cv. Regal) during 7 d of water-deficit
treatment. The physiological relationship between kinetics and accumulation of proline and ammonia in response
to the change in leaf-water parameters was also assessed. All leaf-water parameters measured decreased gradually
under water deficit. Leaf and root dry mass was not significantly affected during the first 3d when decreases in
leaf-water parameters were substantial. However, metabolic parameters such as total N, proline and ammonia were
significantly affected within 1d of commencement of water-deficit treatment. Water-deficit treatment significantly
increased the proline and NH
3
–NH
4
+
concentrations in both leaves and roots. There was a marked reduction in the
amount of N incorporated into the protein fraction from the newly absorbed N (NANP) in water-deficit stressed
plants, particularly in leaf tissue. This reduction in NANP was strongly associated with an increased concentration
of NH
3
–NH
4
+
in roots (P≤0.05) and proline (P≤0.01) in leaves and roots. These results suggest that proline
accumulation may be a sensitive biochemical indicator of plant water status and of the dynamics of de novo protein
synthesis in response to stress severity.
Keywords: ammonia, leaf-water parameters,
15
N-protein, proline, Trifolium repens, water-deficit stress.
Introduction
White clover has a low tolerance to drought because of its
shallow root system. A prolonged drought, which can occur
predominantly in spring in Korea, can kill a population,
and high temperatures throughout the following summer
are also unfavourable for growth. The consequence of
poor sward clover content often leads to problems in
agricultural practice. However, the mechanisms underlying
the inhibition of plant growth by drought are not yet fully
understood.
During prolonged periods of drought, the decrease in
water availability for transport-associated processes leads to
Abbreviations used: NANP, the amounts of newly absorbed N in soluble protein; NCCs, nitrogen containing compounds; RSA, relative specific
activities; RWC, relative water content;
π
, leaf osmotic potential;
π
100
, leaf osmotic potential at full turgor;
w
, leaf water potential;
soil
, soil
matric potential.
changes in the concentrations of many metabolites, followed
by disruptions to amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Several classes of compounds increase during drought,
including compatible solutes such as the special amino acid
proline, sugars, sugar-alcohols and glycinebetaine (Yancey
et al. 1982; Girousse et al. 1996). Proposed roles for
proline in stress tolerance include serving as osmotica,
stabilising macromolecules and membranes and detoxifying
tissues of excess N (Huang et al. 1994; Rabe 1999). Direct
evidence supporting these roles was provided by some mutant
and transgenic proline-over-producing plants, which show
increased osmotolerance (Hong et al. 2000; Roosens et al.
© CSIRO 2004 10.1071/FP04059 1445-4408/04/080847